BEWARE THE FAIR TRADING SCAM

By Jackie Pearson

Another banking scam to look out for is called the Office of Fair Trading Scam. It works like this.

The caller tells you they are from your bank and explains that your bank has been over-charging you for years. The reason for the call is that they need to verify your personal information so they can organise for the Office of Fair Trading, which has supposedly prosecuted your bank for over-charging, to provide you with a refund.

Before you can get that refund, the person calling says they need to issue you with a unique security code and to do that they will need to verify your account details.

The person then proceeds to read you the first four digits of your credit or debit card number and then asks you to verify the remaining 12 digits of the number. This is an easy trap to fall into because, well, who doesn't want their bank to pay them a refund for over-charging.

What most consumers don't know is that the first four digits of your credit or debit card are the same for every card issued by your bank. Those four digits are like the card BSB number.

YOUR BANK SHOULD NEVER, EVER ASK YOU FOR PERSONAL DETAILS OVER THE PHONE. If any caller asks for your credit or debit card number or for the three-digit security card number on the bank of your card, THEY ARE NOT REALLY FROM YOUR BANK.

When I received one of these scam calls on my home phone recently I asked the caller to stay on the line while I called my bank on my mobile phone to verify that they were, in fact, a representative of the bank. Guess what, they hung up straight away!

So repeat after me: "I am sorry, I never give my account or card details to anyone over the phone, even if you say you are representing a charity or want to GIVE ME MONEY. If you want my personal and confidential banking information, send me your details in writing so I can verify them with my bank". If you say those words, even on occasions when you are convinced the call is legitimate, you will stay safe and free of nasty scams!

CUSTOMERS DRIVE COMPETITION

I must say I am finding the banking competition inquiry a bit too cosy and friendly. Not a great deal of hard questioning from our Senators to the bankers or non-bankers or consumer reps.
As someone who has written about banking and interest rates from the CONSUMER perspective for some time now, the Treasurer's "reform" package and ideas being recommended during the public hearings are classic deck chair re-arranging.
Competition between banks and non-banks, banks and mutual deposit-takers such as credit unions will not improve until consumers demand a better deal.
Initiatives to improve financial literacy in this country over the past 10 years have not garnered great outcomes. Many Australians still do not understand their mortgages, realise how interest is calculated on either their savings or credit contracts. They don't even keep track of what they are earning and spending. Until that changes, the banks can continue to get away with peddling complex, incomprehensible contracts that bind the uneducated customer to their brand for longer than necessary.
It will be customers that make the financial services marketplace truly competitive and while we are all slaves to our offset accounts and credit cards, the level of awareness and effort needed to drive a truly good deal, simply won't exist.

THIS WEEK'S NEWS YOU CAN USE

What's been happening in consumer financial services in the past seven days? Here are some stories, events, items and issues you may not have noticed.

• Small super funds doing better than big: the Financial Standard reported that all super fund returns have recovered to an average of 6.6% for the year ending October 2010 but the big funds are still "failing to fire". How does your fund's return compare with the industry average? We're very removed from our super in Australia but it is worth keeping an eye on, at least quarterly and talking to your fund if you're not happy with the bottom line. It's also worth checking your employer is paying what they should and that you have adequate insurance.
• The Tax Office will take a look at 10,000 self-managed super funds: one area that seems to be bringing SMSF trustees undone is the offering of financial support to fund members and their relatives. Unless such arrangements can be proven to be loans they are deemed to be early access to your super, which is illegal unless provided under very strict circumstances. If you're an SMSF trustee make sure you have a regular look at the ATO website, it has excellent SMSF information.
• All eyes on Asia: according to a report from Cerulli Associates: global emerging market funds domiciled in Europe are set to double between now and 2014 as more institutional investors take advantage of the rapid economic expansion of the Asian region. Stay tuned for future Truepenny posts on how to build safe exposure to the Asian boom.
• Early victories for Climate Advocacy Fund: Australian Ethical's Climate Advocacy Fund has scored some early victories since its launch earlier this year. Two resource companies, Aquila and Paladin have agreed to greater disclosure around their carbon emissions as a result of lobbying from the new fund, along with the Climate Institute. Stay tuned for more information about the Climate Advocacy Fund and other responsible investment opportunities.
• Rates on hold? The Reserve Bank is expected to keep interest rates on hold at its December board meeting although more rate rises are expected early in 2011. This is the bank's last opportunity to adjust rates before its February board meeting. So at least mortgagees have two months of certainty.

MOVE TO A MUTUAL

By Jackie Pearson

Abacus Australian Mutuals has today declared that the best way to improve competition in the Australian banking sector is to "empower consumers" and provide building societies and credit unions with fairer access to funding.
In terms of empowering consumers, yes, it is important that the current Senate Inquiry into banking competition does look at the impediments and complexities created by the big banks to make it extremely difficult for consumer to switch.
In particular it needs to take a hard look at mortgage exit penalties and the "bundling" of mortgages with an array of other products.
Abacus CEO Louise Petscher said the group's submission to the Senate Inquiry recommended the continuation of the government guarantee on deposits up to $1 million and the reinstatement of a flat fee wholesale guarantee to help non-banks compete with the big mortgage providers.
Meanwhile there is one definite way that we can all cement the position of credit unions and building societies as the fifth pillar of Australian banking.
We can take a serious look at the service, interest, fees and deals being offered by our local credit unions. We can compare those deals, closely, with the ones currently provided by the big four. In most instances (there are some inferior credit unions) you'll find the mutual down the road has more to offer than any of the big four.
So why not open an account with a mutual and gradually switch over all your direct credits and debits until you're at a point where you can tell your bank what you really think of it. And end the conversation with "goodbye".